Jen Heldt appreciates the value of peer revision. Her blog, “Revisions” is directed entirely at peer review. I agree that peer editing is an excellent way to hear someone else’s voice speaking your words. That voice may not match your intent, so she states that peer review is an option, not a requirement. However, I will note that peer review is limited in its effectiveness outside a classroom setting. She should consider the method of personal review, as well as its benefits. I would add that sometimes time is the best tool for reviewing rhetoric, regardless of whether it is self or peer review.
Her blogspot link is as follows:
Jen Heldt Comp 106
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment